Category: Uncategorized

  • Phase 3 IDeate-Esophageal01 Trial Initiated for Unresectable ESCC

    In a groundbreaking stride for oncology, the first patient has been dosed in the phase 3 IDeate-Esophageal01 trial, marking a beacon of hope for individuals grappling with one of the most stubborn forms of cancer: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Spearheaded by pharmaceutical giants Merck and Daiichi Sankyo, this trial seeks to assess the efficacy of ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd), an innovative antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) designed to combat unresectable advanced or metastatic ESCC. For context, ESCC is known for its aggressive nature, limited treatment options, and low survival rates, which makes this trial a potentially transformative leap forward. This initiative signifies not just hope for patients but also a shining example of how cutting-edge research and strategic industry partnerships strive to rewrite the narrative of cancer treatment.

    The origins and potential of ifinatamab deruxtecan stem from earlier promising results observed in the phase 1/2 IDeate-PanTumor01 study. This study revealed that I-DXd possesses activity against a broad spectrum of solid tumors beyond ESCC, including lung and prostate cancers. Impressively, the trial registered an objective response rate of 32% among 118 patients, with confirmed responses observed in 28% of the cohort. Such statistics, presented at the prestigious European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congresses in 2022 and 2023, underscore the drug’s capacity to impact multiple tumor types, underscoring the exciting wave of precision oncology. It’s remarkable to consider how a single targeted therapy could mobilize against various cancers through a shared molecular target, demonstrating the increasing sophistication with which medicine can tailor interventions.

    What sets ifinatamab deruxtecan apart in the crowded oncology landscape is its design as a first-in-class ADC that selectively targets the B7-H3 protein, a molecule overexpressed on certain tumor cells but limited on healthy tissues. This targeting permits the direct delivery of potent chemotherapy to cancer cells while sparing normal cells from excessive toxicity—a concept akin to a precision-guided missile versus a carpet bomb. The drug was discovered by Daiichi Sankyo and is being developed in partnership with Merck, exemplifying the growing trend of collaboration among pharmaceutical leaders to accelerate breakthroughs. During the IDeate-Esophageal01 trial, participants will be randomly assigned to receive either I-DXd or one of three comparator chemotherapy agents—docetaxel, paclitaxel, or irinotecan hydrochloride—in standardized cycles, enabling a rigorous evaluation of therapeutic benefit and safety.

    Patient eligibility for this trial reflects a careful balance of scientific rigor and patient safety. Individuals enrolled are adults with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic ESCC, whose disease has progressed despite prior platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Crucially, participants must have measurable disease and adequate performance status to ensure accurate evaluation of treatment impact on survival and disease progression. The trial's primary endpoint focuses on overall survival, while secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, duration of response, and safety profile, collectively painting a comprehensive picture of the drug’s value. Moreover, strict exclusion criteria are applied to protect patient welfare and preserve the integrity of the study, reflecting ethical and scientific standards in clinical research.

    The launch of the IDeate-Esophageal01 trial exemplifies the relentless quest by the medical community to surmount the daunting challenges posed by ESCC. As Dr. Marjorie Green of Merck articulates, limited survival advancements in advanced ESCC create an urgent call for novel therapies. Similarly, Dr. Mark Rutstein of Daiichi Sankyo highlights that encouraging data from earlier studies fuel optimism that ifinatamab deruxtecan might revolutionize treatment paradigms. Beyond medicine, this endeavor showcases the power of collaboration—in this case, between Merck and Daiichi Sankyo—to pool expertise and resources, thereby expediting the journey from laboratory science to patient care. For patients facing this aggressive cancer and their healthcare providers, the trial stands as a hopeful milestone toward more effective, targeted treatments in the years ahead.

    #EsophagealCancer #Immunotherapy #ClinicalTrials #OncologyInnovation #AntibodyDrugConjugate #CancerResearch #MerckDaiichiSankyo

  • Astellas Presents New Data that Explores Potential of its Cancer Therapies at 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

    Astellas Pharma Inc. set the stage for excitement and hope in cancer treatment with the announcement of 16 new abstracts showcasing clinical data at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, held from May 30 to June 3 in Chicago. With a persistent focus on outcomes that truly resonate with patients, Astellas, a globally recognized life sciences company headquartered in Tokyo, is affirming its pioneering status in oncology. Their presentations spotlight not only cutting-edge research but also a deep dedication to improving survival rates and quality of life for cancer patients. The data presented at ASCO highlights long-term survival and efficacy outcomes related to their approved therapies such as XTANDI (enzalutamide) and PADCEV (enfortumab vedotin), which are crucial for patients with various types of prostate and urothelial cancers.

    One of the highlights includes long-term overall survival (OS) analyses for XTANDI, a medication used in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). The ARCHES study, which will be featured in an oral presentation, reveals a five-year follow-up on the combination of enzalutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) demonstrating sustained benefits for patients. This breakthrough offers new hope for men battling metastatic prostate cancer, presenting a treatment option that can potentially extend life and improve outcomes over an extended period. Complementing this are independent investigator-sponsored studies like ENZAMET from the Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group, providing robust eight-year data directly comparing enzalutamide to non-steroidal anti-androgens. These extensive data collections reinforce the therapy's pivotal role in managing prostate cancer, illuminating avenues for personalized treatment.

    PADCEV (enfortumab vedotin), another cancer fighter in the Astellas portfolio, is making waves with new phase 3 trial data exploring its use for urothelial carcinoma, encompassing bladder and urinary tract cancers. Presented analyses from the EV-302 study delve into the combination of PADCEV with pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA) against standard chemotherapy. The therapeutic duo showcased promising results in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, intensifying the spotlight on immunotherapy combinations as a new frontier in cancer care. An oral presentation dedicated to exploratory analyses of patient responders furthers understanding of the therapeutic mechanisms, aiming to optimize and personalize treatments based on patient-specific factors. Notably, a comprehensive meta-analysis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer trials will also be displayed, offering insights into surrogate endpoints crucial for clinical decision-making.

    Behind these scientific advancements lies a commitment from Astellas’ leadership, evident in the statements of Dr. Moitreyee Chatterjee-Kishore, Head of Oncology Development, and Shontelle Dodson, Head of Medical Affairs. They emphasize the company’s mission to transform cancer care through innovative therapies and precision medicine, striving to extend lives with not only efficacy but also safety. However, these therapies come with important safety considerations and potential adverse reactions. For instance, XTANDI, while instrumental in prostate cancer treatment, carries warnings including risks of seizures, hypertension, falls, fractures, and rare neurological conditions like Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES). PADCEV’s safety profile includes severe skin reactions, hyperglycemia, peripheral neuropathy, and pneumonitis, underscoring the necessity of careful patient monitoring and management during treatment. Additionally, VYLOY and XOSPATA, other treatments within the portfolio, bring their own considerations ranging from infusion-related reactions to pancreatitis and differentiation syndrome. These candid acknowledgments speak to Astellas’ transparent approach to patient safety, providing healthcare providers with crucial information to optimize treatment strategies.

    Astellas’ commitment extends beyond just today’s therapies. The company is deeply invested in the future of oncology, leveraging novel modalities and biomarker-driven approaches to push the boundaries of what is possible. Their oncology pipeline includes promising agents such as zolbetuximab and gilteritinib, aimed at various cancers with unmet medical needs. Aligning with global giants like Pfizer and Merck, Astellas is part of strategic collaborations to enhance efficacy, exemplified by combining PADCEV with Merck’s KEYTRUDA for metastatic urothelial cancer. Such partnerships help broaden therapeutic options, indicating a future where precision and combination therapies play a dominant role in cancer treatment landscapes. Their expansive research showcases an engaging blend of science and patient-focused care, creating a narrative of hope amidst the challenges of cancer.

    Astellas’ presentations at the ASCO Annual Meeting reflect an exciting confluence of innovation, clinical rigor, and patient-centric care philosophy. As oncology continues to evolve rapidly, such new data provide clinicians and patients with compelling evidence to make informed decisions. The amplified understanding of drug efficacy, safety, and combination regimens heralds better management strategies for challenging cancers like prostate and urothelial. Moreover, Astellas’ transparent communication regarding risks and side effects reinforces responsible treatment stewardship. As we await further clinical results and regulatory approvals, the oncology community can be optimistic that the future holds improved survival rates augmented by therapies tailored to individual patient profiles. Those seeking more detailed insights or updates on ongoing clinical trials can explore Astellas’ dedicated resources for the latest research developments.

    #AstellasOncology #CancerResearch #ProstateCancer #BladderCancer #ASCO2025 #CancerTherapies #PrecisionMedicine

  • Astellas Presents New Data that Explores Potential of its Cancer Therapies at 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

    Bladder cancer

    A systematic review and meta-analysis of surrogate endpoints in muscle-invasive bladder cancer trials will be featured in a poster presentation.

    Shontelle Dodson, Executive Vice President, Head of Medical Affairs, Astellas

    "Long-term overall survival is the gold standard endpoint in cancer research. New post hoc analysis data from the ARCHES enzalutamide trial demonstrates our mission to help patients live longer, healthier lives. We are committed to maximizing the impact of our therapies as we continue to pioneer the oncology medicines of tomorrow."

    Astellas Presentations at 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

    Enzalutamide

    Enfortumab vedotin

    Zolbetuximab

    Gilteritinib

    Pipeline

    About Astellas

    Astellas is a global life sciences company committed to turning innovative science into VALUE for patients. We provide transformative therapies in disease areas that include oncology, ophthalmology, urology, immunology and women's health. Through our research and development programs, we are pioneering new healthcare solutions for diseases with high unmet medical need. Learn more at www.astellas.com.

    About PADCEV and the Astellas, Pfizer and Merck Collaboration

    Astellas and Pfizer have a clinical collaboration agreement with Merck to evaluate the combination of Astellas' and Pfizer's PADCEV (enfortumab vedotin) and Merck's KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) in patients with previously untreated metastatic urothelial cancer. KEYTRUDA is a registered trademark of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (known as MSD outside of the United States and Canada).

    About XTANDI and the Pfizer/Astellas Collaboration

    In October 2009, Medivation, Inc., which is now part of Pfizer (NYSE:PFE), and Astellas (TSE: 4503) entered into a commercial agreement to jointly develop and commercialize XTANDI® (enzalutamide) in the United States, while Astellas has responsibility for manufacturing and all additional regulatory filings globally, as well as commercializing the product outside the United States. Pfizer receives alliance revenues as a share of U.S. profits and receives royalties on sales outside the U.S.

    XTANDI Important Safety Information

    Warnings and Precautions

    Seizure occurred in 0.6% of patients receiving XTANDI in eight randomized clinical trials. In a study of patients with predisposing factors for seizure, 2.2% of XTANDI-treated patients experienced a seizure. It is unknown whether anti-epileptic medications will prevent seizures with XTANDI. Patients in the study had one or more of the following predisposing factors: use of medications that may lower the seizure threshold, history of traumatic brain or head injury, history of cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack, and Alzheimer's disease, meningioma, or leptomeningeal disease from prostate cancer, unexplained loss of consciousness within the last 12 months, history of seizure, presence of a space occupying lesion of the brain, history of arteriovenous malformation, or history of brain infection. Advise patients of the risk of developing a seizure while taking XTANDI and of engaging in any activity where sudden loss of consciousness could cause serious harm to themselves or others. Permanently discontinue XTANDI in patients who develop a seizure during treatment.

    Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) There have been reports of PRES in patients receiving XTANDI. PRES is a neurological disorder that can present with rapidly evolving symptoms including seizure, headache, lethargy, confusion, blindness, and other visual and neurological disturbances, with or without associated hypertension. A diagnosis of PRES requires confirmation by brain imaging, preferably MRI. Discontinue XTANDI in patients who develop PRES.

    Hypersensitivity reactions, including edema of the face (0.5%), tongue (0.1%), or lip (0.1%) have been observed with XTANDI in eight randomized clinical trials. Pharyngeal edema has been reported in post-marketing cases. Advise patients who experience any symptoms of hypersensitivity to temporarily discontinue XTANDI and promptly seek medical care. Permanently discontinue XTANDI for serious hypersensitivity reactions.

    Ischemic Heart Disease In the combined data of five randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies, ischemic heart disease occurred more commonly in patients on the XTANDI arm compared to patients on the placebo arm (3.5% vs 2%). Grade 3-4 ischemic events occurred in 1.8% of patients on XTANDI versus 1.1% on placebo. Ischemic events led to death in 0.4% of patients on XTANDI compared to 0.1% on placebo. Monitor for signs and symptoms of ischemic heart disease. Optimize management of cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia. Discontinue XTANDI for Grade 3-4 ischemic heart disease.

    Falls and Fractures occurred in patients receiving XTANDI. Evaluate patients for fracture and fall risk. Monitor and manage patients at risk for fractures according to established treatment guidelines and consider use of bone-targeted agents. In the combined data of five randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies, falls occurred in 12% of patients treated with XTANDI compared to 6% of patients treated with placebo. Fractures occurred in 13% of patients treated with XTANDI and in 6% of patients treated with placebo.

    Embryo-Fetal Toxicity The safety and efficacy of XTANDI have not been established in females. XTANDI can cause fetal harm and loss of pregnancy when administered to a pregnant female. Advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with XTANDI and for 3 months after the last dose of XTANDI.

    Dysphagia or Choking Severe dysphagia or choking, including events that could be life-threatening requiring medical intervention or fatal, can occur due to XTANDI product size. Advise patients to take each capsule or tablet whole with a sufficient amount of water to ensure that all medication is successfully swallowed. Consider use of a smaller tablet size of XTANDI in patients who have difficulty swallowing. Discontinue XTANDI for patients who cannot swallow capsules or tablets.

    Adverse Reactions (ARs)

    In the data from the five randomized placebo-controlled trials, the most common ARs (≥ 10%) that occurred more frequently (≥ 2% over placebo) in XTANDI-treated patients were musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, hot flush, constipation, decreased appetite, diarrhea, hypertension, hemorrhage, fall, fracture, and headache. In the bicalutamide-controlled study, the most common ARs (≥ 10%) reported in XTANDI-treated patients were asthenia/fatigue, back pain, musculoskeletal pain, hot flush, hypertension, nausea, constipation, diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infection, and weight loss.

    In AFFIRM, the placebo-controlled study of metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) patients who previously received docetaxel, Grade 3 and higher ARs were reported among 47% of XTANDI-treated patients.

    Discontinuations due to ARs were reported for 16% of XTANDI-treated patients. In PREVAIL, the placebo-controlled study of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients, Grade 3-4 ARs were reported in 44% of XTANDI patients and 37% of placebo patients. Discontinuations due to ARs were reported for 6% of XTANDI-treated patients. In TERRAIN, the bicalutamide-controlled study of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients, Grade 3-4 ARs were reported in 39% of XTANDI patients and 38% of bicalutamide patients. Discontinuations with an AR as the primary reason were reported for 8% of XTANDI patients and 6% of bicalutamide patients.

    In PROSPER, the placebo-controlled study of nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC) patients, Grade 3 or higher ARs were reported in 31% of XTANDI patients and 23% of placebo patients.

    Discontinuations with an AR as the primary reason were reported for 9% of XTANDI patients and 6% of placebo patients.

    In ARCHES, the placebo-controlled study of metastatic CSPC (mCSPC) patients, Grade 3 or higher ARs were reported in 24% of XTANDI-treated patients. Permanent discontinuation due to ARs as the primary reason was reported in 5% of XTANDI patients and 4% of placebo patients.

    In EMBARK, the placebo-controlled study of nonmetastatic CSPC (nmCSPC) with high-risk biochemical recurrence (BCR) patients, Grade 3 or higher adverse reactions during the total duration of treatment were reported in 46% of patients treated with XTANDI plus leuprolide, 50% of patients receiving XTANDI as a single agent, and 43% of patients receiving placebo plus leuprolide. Permanent treatment discontinuation due to adverse reactions during the total duration of treatment as the primary reason was reported in 21% of patients treated with XTANDI plus leuprolide, 18% of patients receiving XTANDI as a single agent, and 10% of patients receiving placebo plus leuprolide.

    Lab Abnormalities: Lab abnormalities that occurred in ≥ 5% of patients, and more frequently (> 2%) in the XTANDI arm compared to placebo in the pooled, randomized, placebo-controlled studies are hemoglobin decrease, neutrophil count decreased, white blood cell decreased, hyperglycemia, hypermagnesemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia, and hypercalcemia.

    Hypertension: In the combined data from five randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials, hypertension was reported in 14% of XTANDI patients and 7% of placebo patients. Hypertension led to study discontinuation in < 1% of patients in each arm.

    Drug Interactions

    Effect of Other Drugs on XTANDI Avoid coadministration with strong CYP2C8 inhibitors. If coadministration cannot be avoided, reduce the dosage of XTANDI.

    Avoid coadministration with strong CYP3A4 inducers. If coadministration cannot be avoided, increase the dosage of XTANDI.

    Effect of XTANDI on Other Drugs Avoid coadministration with certain CYP3A4, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 substrates for which minimal decrease in concentration may lead to therapeutic failure of the substrate. If coadministration cannot be avoided, increase the dosage of these substrates in accordance with their Prescribing Information. In cases where active metabolites are formed, there may be increased exposure to the active metabolites.

    Full Prescribing Information

    PADCEV Important Safety Information

    Warnings and Precautions

    Skin reactions Severe cutaneous adverse reactions, including fatal cases of SJS or TEN occurred in patients treated with PADCEV. SJS and TEN occurred predominantly during the first cycle of treatment but may occur later. Skin reactions occurred in 70% (all grades) of the 564 patients treated with PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab in clinical trials. When PADCEV was given in combination with pembrolizumab, the incidence of skin reactions, including severe events, occurred at a higher rate compared to PADCEV as a single agent. The majority of the skin reactions that occurred with combination therapy included maculo-papular rash, macular rash and papular rash. Grade 3-4 skin reactions occurred in 17% of patients (Grade 3: 16%, Grade 4: 1%), including maculo-papular rash, bullous dermatitis, dermatitis, exfoliative dermatitis, pemphigoid, rash, erythematous rash, macular rash, and papular rash. A fatal reaction of bullous dermatitis occurred in one patient (0.2%). The median time to onset of severe skin reactions was 1.7 months (range: 0.1 to 17.2 months). Skin reactions led to discontinuation of PADCEV in 6% of patients.

    Skin reactions occurred in 58% (all grades) of the 720 patients treated with PADCEV as a single agent in clinical trials. Twenty-three percent (23%) of patients had maculo-papular rash and 34% had pruritus. Grade 3-4 skin reactions occurred in 14% of patients, including maculo-papular rash, erythematous rash, rash or drug eruption, symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE), bullous dermatitis, exfoliative dermatitis, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. The median time to onset of severe skin reactions was 0.6 months (range: 0.1 to 8 months). Among patients experiencing a skin reaction leading to dose interruption who then restarted PADCEV (n=75), 24% of patients restarting at the same dose and 24% of patients restarting at a reduced dose experienced recurrent severe skin reactions. Skin reactions led to discontinuation of PADCEV in 3.1% of patients.

    Monitor patients closely throughout treatment for skin reactions. Consider topical corticosteroids and antihistamines, as clinically indicated. For persistent or recurrent Grade 2 skin reactions, consider withholding PADCEV until Grade ≤1. Withhold PADCEV and refer for specialized care for suspected SJS, TEN or for Grade 3 skin reactions. Permanently discontinue PADCEV in patients with confirmed SJS or TEN; or Grade 4 or recurrent Grade 3 skin reactions.

    Hyperglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), including fatal events, occurred in patients with and without pre-existing diabetes mellitus, treated with PADCEV. Patients with baseline hemoglobin A1C ≥8% were excluded from clinical trials. In clinical trials of PADCEV as a single agent, 17% of the 720 patients treated with PADCEV developed hyperglycemia of any grade; 7% of patients developed Grade 3-4 hyperglycemia (Grade 3: 6.5%, Grade 4: 0.6%). Fatal events of hyperglycemia and DKA occurred in one patient each (0.1%). The incidence of Grade 3-4 hyperglycemia increased consistently in patients with higher body mass index and in patients with higher baseline A1C. The median time to onset of hyperglycemia was 0.5 months (range: 0 to 20 months). Hyperglycemia led to discontinuation of PADCEV in 0.7% of patients. Five percent (5%) of patients required initiation of insulin therapy for treatment of hyperglycemia. Of the patients who initiated insulin therapy for treatment of hyperglycemia, 66% (23/35) discontinued insulin at the time of last evaluation. Closely monitor blood glucose levels in patients with, or at risk for, diabetes mellitus or hyperglycemia. If blood glucose is elevated (>250 mg/dL), withhold PADCEV.

    Pneumonitis/Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Severe, life-threatening or fatal pneumonitis/ILD occurred in patients treated with PADCEV. When PADCEV was given in combination with pembrolizumab, 10% of the 564 patients treated with combination therapy had pneumonitis/ILD of any grade and 4% had Grade 3-4. A fatal event of pneumonitis/ILD occurred in two patients (0.4%). The incidence of pneumonitis/ILD, including severe events, occurred at a higher rate when PADCEV was given in combination with pembrolizumab compared to PADCEV as a single agent. The median time to onset of any grade pneumonitis/ILD was 4 months (range: 0.3 to 26 months).

    In clinical trials of PADCEV as a single agent, 3% of the 720 patients treated with PADCEV had pneumonitis/ILD of any grade and 0.8% had Grade 3-4. The median time to onset of any grade pneumonitis/ILD was 2.9 months (range: 0.6 to 6 months).

    Monitor patients for signs and symptoms indicative of pneumonitis/ILD such as hypoxia, cough, dyspnea or interstitial infiltrates on radiologic exams. Evaluate and exclude infectious, neoplastic and other causes for such signs and symptoms through appropriate investigations. Withhold PADCEV for patients who develop Grade 2 pneumonitis/ILD and consider dose reduction. Permanently discontinue PADCEV in all patients with Grade 3 or 4 pneumonitis/ILD.

    Peripheral neuropathy (PN) When PADCEV was given in combination with pembrolizumab, 67% of the 564 patients treated with combination therapy had PN of any grade, 36% had Grade 2 neuropathy, and 7% had Grade 3 neuropathy. The incidence of PN occurred at a higher rate when PADCEV was given in combination with pembrolizumab compared to PADCEV as a single agent. The median time to onset of Grade ≥2 PN was 6 months (range: 0.3 to 25 months).

    PN occurred in 53% of the 720 patients treated with PADCEV as a single agent in clinical trials including 38% with sensory neuropathy, 8% with muscular weakness and 7% with motor neuropathy. Thirty percent of patients experienced Grade 2 reactions and 5% experienced Grade 3-4 reactions. PN occurred in patients treated with PADCEV with or without preexisting PN. The median time to onset of Grade ≥2 PN was 4.9 months (range: 0.1 to 20 months). Neuropathy led to treatment discontinuation in 6% of patients.

    Monitor patients for symptoms of new or worsening PN and consider dose interruption or dose reduction of PADCEV when PN occurs. Permanently discontinue PADCEV in patients who develop Grade ≥3 PN.

    Ocular disorders were reported in 40% of the 384 patients treated with PADCEV as a single agent in clinical trials in which ophthalmologic exams were scheduled. The majority of these events involved the cornea and included events associated with dry eye such as keratitis, blurred vision, increased lacrimation, conjunctivitis, limbal stem cell deficiency, and keratopathy. Dry eye symptoms occurred in 30% of patients, and blurred vision occurred in 10% of patients, during treatment with PADCEV. The median time to onset to symptomatic ocular disorder was 1.7 months (range: 0 to 30.6 months). Monitor patients for ocular disorders. Consider artificial tears for prophylaxis of dry eyes and ophthalmologic evaluation if ocular symptoms occur or do not resolve. Consider treatment with ophthalmic topical steroids, if indicated after an ophthalmic exam. Consider dose interruption or dose reduction of PADCEV for symptomatic ocular disorders.

    Infusion site extravasation Skin and soft tissue reactions secondary to extravasation have been observed after administration of PADCEV. Of the 720 patients treated with PADCEV as a single agent in clinical trials, 1% of patients experienced skin and soft tissue reactions, including 0.3% who experienced Grade 3-4 reactions. Reactions may be delayed. Erythema, swelling, increased temperature, and pain worsened until 2-7 days after extravasation and resolved within 1-4 weeks of peak. Two patients (0.3%) developed extravasation reactions with secondary cellulitis, bullae, or exfoliation. Ensure adequate venous access prior to starting PADCEV and monitor for possible extravasation during administration. If extravasation occurs, stop the infusion and monitor for adverse reactions.

    Embryo-fetal toxicity PADCEV can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise patients of the potential risk to the fetus. Advise female patients of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during PADCEV treatment and for 2 months after the last dose. Advise male patients with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with PADCEV and for 4 months after the last dose.

    ADVERSE REACTIONS

    Most common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) (PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab)

    Increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), increased creatinine, rash, increased glucose, PN, increased lipase, decreased lymphocytes, increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT), decreased hemoglobin, fatigue, decreased sodium, decreased phosphate, decreased albumin, pruritus, diarrhea, alopecia, decreased weight, decreased appetite, increased urate, decreased neutrophils, decreased potassium, dry eye, nausea, constipation, increased potassium, dysgeusia, urinary tract infection and decreased platelets.

    Most common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) (PADCEV monotherapy)

    Increased glucose, increased AST, decreased lymphocytes, increased creatinine, rash, fatigue, PN, decreased albumin, decreased hemoglobin, alopecia, decreased appetite, decreased neutrophils, decreased sodium, increased ALT, decreased phosphate, diarrhea, nausea, pruritus, increased urate, dry eye, dysgeusia, constipation, increased lipase, decreased weight, decreased platelets, abdominal pain, dry skin.

    EV-302 Study: 440 patients with previously untreated la/mUC (PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab)

    Serious adverse reactions occurred in 50% of patients treated with PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab. The most common serious adverse reactions (≥2%) were rash (6%), acute kidney injury (5%), pneumonitis/ILD (4.5%), urinary tract infection (3.6%), diarrhea (3.2%), pneumonia (2.3%), pyrexia (2%), and hyperglycemia (2%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 3.9% of patients treated with PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab including acute respiratory failure (0.7%), pneumonia (0.5%), and pneumonitis/ILD (0.2%).

    Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation of PADCEV occurred in 35% of patients. The most common adverse reactions (≥2%) leading to discontinuation of PADCEV were PN (15%), rash (4.1%) and pneumonitis/ILD (2.3%). Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption of PADCEV occurred in 73% of patients. The most common adverse reactions (≥2%) leading to dose interruption of PADCEV were PN (22%), rash (16%), COVID‑19 (10%), diarrhea (5%), pneumonitis/ILD (4.8%), fatigue (3.9%), hyperglycemia (3.6%), increased ALT (3%) and pruritus (2.5%). Adverse reactions leading to dose reduction of PADCEV occurred in 42% of patients. The most common adverse reactions (≥2%) leading to dose reduction of PADCEV were rash (16%), PN (13%) and fatigue (2.7%).

    EV-103 Study: 121 patients with previously untreated la/mUC who were not eligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy (PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab)

    Serious adverse reactions occurred in 50% of patients treated with PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab; the most common (≥2%) were acute kidney injury (7%), urinary tract infection (7%), urosepsis (5%), sepsis (3.3%), pneumonia (3.3%), hematuria (3.3%), pneumonitis/ILD (3.3%), urinary retention (2.5%), diarrhea (2.5%), myasthenia gravis (2.5%), myositis (2.5%), anemia (2.5%), and hypotension (2.5%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 5% of patients treated with PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab, including sepsis (1.6%), bullous dermatitis (0.8%), myasthenia gravis (0.8%), and pneumonitis/ILD (0.8%). Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation of PADCEV occurred in 36% of patients; the most common (≥2%) were PN (20%) and rash (6%). Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption of PADCEV occurred in 69% of patients; the most common (≥2%) were PN (18%), rash (12%), increased lipase (6%), pneumonitis/ILD (6%), diarrhea (4.1%), acute kidney injury (3.3%), increased ALT (3.3%), fatigue (3.3%), neutropenia (3.3%), urinary tract infection (3.3%), increased amylase (2.5%), anemia (2.5%), COVID‑19 (2.5%), hyperglycemia (2.5%), and hypotension (2.5%). Adverse reactions leading to dose reduction of PADCEV occurred in 45% of patients; the most common (≥2%) were PN (17%), rash (12%), fatigue (5%), neutropenia (5%), and diarrhea (4.1%).

    EV-301 Study: 296 patients previously treated with a PD-1/L1 inhibitor and platinum-based chemotherapy (PADCEV monotherapy)

    Serious adverse reactions occurred in 47% of patients treated with PADCEV; the most common (≥2%) were urinary tract infection, acute kidney injury (7% each), and pneumonia (5%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 3% of patients, including multiorgan dysfunction (1%), hepatic dysfunction, septic shock, hyperglycemia, pneumonitis/ILD, and pelvic abscess (0.3% each). Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation occurred in 17% of patients; the most common (≥2%) were PN (5%) and rash (4%). Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption occurred in 61% of patients; the most common (≥4%) were PN (23%), rash (11%), and fatigue (9%). Adverse reactions leading to dose reduction occurred in 34% of patients; the most common (≥2%) were PN (10%), rash (8%), decreased appetite, and fatigue (3% each).

    EV-201, Cohort 2 Study: 89 patients previously treated with a PD-1/L1 inhibitor and not eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy (PADCEV monotherapy)

    Serious adverse reactions occurred in 39% of patients treated with PADCEV; the most common (≥3%) were pneumonia, sepsis, and diarrhea (5% each). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 8% of patients, including acute kidney injury (2.2%), metabolic acidosis, sepsis, multiorgan dysfunction, pneumonia, and pneumonitis/ILD (1.1% each). Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation occurred in 20% of patients; the most common (≥2%) was PN (7%). Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption occurred in 60% of patients; the most common (≥3%) were PN (19%), rash (9%), fatigue (8%), diarrhea (5%), increased AST, and hyperglycemia (3% each). Adverse reactions leading to dose reduction occurred in 49% of patients; the most common (≥3%) were PN (19%), rash (11%), and fatigue (7%).

    DRUG INTERACTIONS

    Effects of other drugs on PADCEV (Dual P-gp and Strong CYP3A4 Inhibitors)

    Concomitant use with dual P-gp and strong CYP3A4 inhibitors may increase unconjugated monomethyl auristatin E exposure, which may increase the incidence or severity of PADCEV toxicities. Closely monitor patients for signs of toxicity when PADCEV is given concomitantly with dual P-gp and strong CYP3A4 inhibitors.

    SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

    Lactation Advise lactating women not to breastfeed during treatment with PADCEV and for 3 weeks after the last dose.

    Hepatic impairment Avoid the use of PADCEV in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment.

    Full Prescribing Information

    VYLOY Important Safety Information

    Warnings and Precautions

    Hypersensitivity reactions, including serious anaphylaxis reactions, and serious and fatal infusion-related reactions (IRR) have been reported in clinical studies when VYLOY has been administered. Any grade hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylactic reactions, occurring with VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX was 18%. Severe (Grade 3 or 4) hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylactic reactions, occurred in 2% of patients. Seven patients (1.3%) permanently discontinued VYLOY for hypersensitivity reactions, including two patients (0.4%) who permanently discontinued VYLOY due to anaphylactic reactions. Seventeen (3.2%) patients required dose interruption, and three patients (0.6%) required infusion rate reduction due to hypersensitivity reactions. All grade IRRs occurred in 3.2% in patients administered VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX. Severe (Grade 3) IRRs occurred in 2 (0.4%) patients who received VYLOY. An IRR led to permanent discontinuation of VYLOY in 2 (0.4%) patients and dose interruption in 7 (1.3%) patients. The infusion rate was reduced for VYLOY for 2 (0.4%) patients due to an IRR. Monitor patients during infusion with VYLOY and for 2 hours after completion of infusion or longer if clinically indicated, for hypersensitivity reactions with symptoms and signs that are highly suggestive of anaphylaxis (urticaria, repetitive cough, wheeze and throat tightness/change in voice). Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of IRRs including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, salivary hypersecretion, pyrexia, chest discomfort, chills, back pain, cough and hypertension. If a severe or life-threatening hypersensitivity or IRR reaction occurs, discontinue VYLOY permanently, treat symptoms according to standard medical care, and monitor until symptoms resolve. For any Grade 2 hypersensitivity or IRR, interrupt the VYLOY infusion until Grade ≤1, then resume at a reduced infusion rate for the remaining infusion. Follow Grade 2 management for Grade 3 infusion-related nausea and vomiting. Premedicate the patient with antihistamines for the subsequent infusions, and closely monitor the patient for symptoms and signs of a hypersensitivity reaction. The infusion rate may be gradually increased as tolerated.

    Severe Nausea and Vomiting. VYLOY is emetogenic. Nausea and vomiting occurred more often during the first cycle of treatment. All grade nausea and vomiting occurred in 82% and 67% respectively of patients treated with VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6 and 69% and 66% in combination with CAPOX, respectively. Severe (Grade 3) nausea occurred in 16% and 9% of patients treated with VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX respectively. Severe (Grade 3) vomiting occurred in 16% and 12% of patients treated with VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX. Nausea led to permanent discontinuation of VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX in 18 (3.4%) patients and dose interruption in 147 (28%) patients. Vomiting led to permanent discontinuation of VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX in 20 (3.8%) patients and dose interruption in 150 (28%) patients. Pretreat with antiemetics prior to each infusion of VYLOY. Manage patients during and after infusion with antiemetics or fluid replacement. Interrupt the infusion, or permanently discontinue VYLOY based on severity.

    ADVERSE REACTIONS

    Most common adverse reactions (≥15%): Nausea, vomiting, fatigue, decreased appetite, diarrhea, peripheral sensory neuropathy, abdominal pain, constipation, decreased weight, hypersensitivity reactions, and pyrexia.

    Most common laboratory abnormalities (≥15%): Decreased neutrophil count, decreased leucocyte count, decreased albumin, increased creatinine, decreased hemoglobin, increased glucose, decreased lymphocyte count, increased aspartate aminotransferase, decreased platelets, increased alkaline phosphatase, increased alanine aminotransferase, decreased glucose, decreased sodium, increased phosphate, decreased potassium, and decreased magnesium.

    SPOTLIGHT Study: 279 patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma whose tumors were CLDN18.2 positive who received at least one dose of VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6

    Serious adverse reactions occurred in 45% of patients treated with VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6; the most common serious adverse reactions (≥2%) were vomiting (8%), nausea (7%), neutropenia (2.9%), febrile neutropenia (2.9%), diarrhea (2.9%), intestinal obstruction (3.2%), pyrexia (2.5%), pneumonia (2.5%), respiratory failure (2.2%), pulmonary embolism (2.2%), decreased appetite (2.1%) and sepsis (2.0%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 5% of patients who received VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6 including sepsis (1.4%), pneumonia (1.1%), respiratory failure (1.1%), intestinal obstruction (0.7%), acute hepatic failure (0.4%), acute myocardial infarction (0.4%), death (0.4%), disseminated intravascular coagulation (0.4%), encephalopathy (0.4%), and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (0.4%). Permanent discontinuation of VYLOY due to an adverse reaction occurred in 20% of patients; the most common adverse reactions leading to discontinuation (≥2%) were nausea and vomiting. Dosage interruptions of VYLOY due to an adverse reaction occurred in 75% of patients; the most common adverse reactions leading to dose interruption (≥5%) were nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, abdominal pain, fatigue, and hypertension.

    GLOW Study: 254 patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma whose tumors were CLDN18.2 positive who received at least one dose of VYLOY in combination with CAPOX

    Serious adverse reactions occurred in 47% of patients treated with VYLOY in combination with CAPOX; the most common serious adverse reactions (≥2%) were vomiting (6%), nausea (4.3%), decreased appetite (3.9%), decreased platelet count (3.1%), upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (2.8%), diarrhea (2.8%), pneumonia (2.4%), pulmonary embolism (2.3%), and pyrexia (2.0%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 8% of patients who received VYLOY in combination with CAPOX including sepsis (1.2%), pneumonia (0.4%), death (0.8%), upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (0.8%), cerebral hemorrhage (0.8%), abdominal infection (0.4%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (0.4%), cardio-respiratory arrest (0.4%), decreased platelet count (0.4%), disseminated intravascular coagulation (0.4%), dyspnea (0.4%), gastric perforation (0.4%), hemorrhagic ascites (0.4%), procedural complication (0.4%), sudden death (0.4%), and syncope (0.4%). Permanent discontinuation of VYLOY due to an adverse reaction occurred in 19% of patients; the most common adverse reaction leading to discontinuation (≥2%) was vomiting. Dosage interruption of VYLOY due to an adverse reaction occurred in 55% of patients; the most common adverse reactions leading to dose interruption (≥2%) were nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, fatigue, infusion-related reaction, and abdominal pain.

    SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

    Lactation Advise lactating women not to breastfeed during treatment with VYLOY and for 8 months after the last dose.

    Full Prescribing Information

    XOSPATA Important Safety Information

    Contraindications

    XOSPATA is contraindicated in patients with hypersensitivity to gilteritinib or any of the excipients. Anaphylactic reactions have been observed in clinical trials.

    Warnings and Precautions

    Differentiation Syndrome (See BOXED WARNING) 3% of 319 patients treated with XOSPATA in the clinical trials experienced differentiation syndrome. Differentiation syndrome is associated with rapid proliferation and differentiation of myeloid cells and may be life-threatening or fatal if not treated. Symptoms and other clinical findings of differentiation syndrome in patients treated with XOSPATA included fever, dyspnea, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, pulmonary edema, hypotension, rapid weight gain, peripheral edema, rash, and renal dysfunction. Some cases had concomitant acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis. Differentiation syndrome occurred as early as 1 day and up to 82 days after XOSPATA initiation and has been observed with or without concomitant leukocytosis. If differentiation syndrome is suspected, initiate dexamethasone 10 mg IV every 12 hours (or an equivalent dose of an alternative oral or IV corticosteroid) and hemodynamic monitoring until improvement. Taper corticosteroids after resolution of symptoms and administer corticosteroids for a minimum of 3 days. Symptoms of differentiation syndrome may recur with premature discontinuation of corticosteroid treatment. If severe signs and/or symptoms persist for more than 48 hours after initiation of corticosteroids, interrupt XOSPATA until signs and symptoms are no longer severe.

    Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) 1% of 319 patients treated with XOSPATA in the clinical trials experienced posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) with symptoms including seizure and altered mental status. Symptoms have resolved after discontinuation of XOSPATA. A diagnosis of PRES requires confirmation by brain imaging, preferably magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Discontinue XOSPATA in patients who develop PRES.

    Prolonged QT Interval XOSPATA has been associated with prolonged cardiac ventricular repolarization (QT interval). 1% of the 317 patients with a post-baseline QTc measurement on treatment with XOSPATA in the clinical trial were found to have a QTc interval greater than 500 msec and 7% of patients had an increase from baseline QTc greater than 60 msec. Perform electrocardiogram (ECG) prior to initiation of treatment with XOSPATA, on days 8 and 15 of cycle 1, and prior to the start of the next two subsequent cycles. Interrupt and reduce XOSPATA dosage in patients who have a QTcF >500 msec. Hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia may increase the QT prolongation risk. Correct hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia prior to and during XOSPATA administration.

    Pancreatitis 4% of 319 patients treated with XOSPATA in the clinical trials experienced pancreatitis. Evaluate patients who develop signs and symptoms of pancreatitis. Interrupt and reduce the dose of XOSPATA in patients who develop pancreatitis.

    Embryo-Fetal Toxicity XOSPATA can cause embryo-fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with XOSPATA and for 6 months after the last dose of XOSPATA. Advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with XOSPATA and for 4 months after the last dose of XOSPATA. Pregnant women, patients becoming pregnant while receiving XOSPATA or male patients with pregnant female partners should be apprised of the potential risk to the fetus.

    Adverse Reactions

    Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 2% of patients receiving XOSPATA. These were cardiac arrest (1%) and one case each of differentiation syndrome and pancreatitis. The most frequent (≥5%) nonhematological serious adverse reactions reported in patients were fever (13%), dyspnea (9%), renal impairment (8%), transaminase increased (6%) and noninfectious diarrhea (5%).

    7% discontinued XOSPATA treatment permanently due to an adverse reaction. The most common (>1%) adverse reactions leading to discontinuation were aspartate aminotransferase increased (2%) and alanine aminotransferase increased (2%).

    The most frequent (≥5%) grade ≥3 nonhematological adverse reactions reported in patients were transaminase increased (21%), dyspnea (12%), hypotension (7%), mucositis (7%), myalgia/arthralgia (7%), and fatigue/malaise (6%).

    Other clinically significant adverse reactions occurring in ≤10% of patients included: electrocardiogram QT prolonged (9%), hypersensitivity (8%), pancreatitis (5%), cardiac failure (4%), pericardial effusion (4%), acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis (3%), differentiation syndrome (3%), pericarditis/myocarditis (2%), large intestine perforation (1%), and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (1%).

    Lab Abnormalities Shifts to grades 3-4 nonhematologic laboratory abnormalities in XOSPATA treated patients included phosphate decreased (14%), alanine aminotransferase increased (13%), sodium decreased (12%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (10%), calcium decreased (6%), creatine kinase increased (6%), triglycerides increased (6%), creatinine increased (3%), and alkaline phosphatase increased (2%).

    Drug Interactions

    Combined P-gp and Strong CYP3A Inducers Concomitant use of XOSPATA with a combined P-gp and strong CYP3A inducer decreases XOSPATA exposure which may decrease XOSPATA efficacy. Avoid concomitant use of XOSPATA with combined P-gp and strong CYP3A inducers.

    Strong CYP3A inhibitors Concomitant use of XOSPATA with a strong CYP3A inhibitor increases XOSPATA exposure. Consider alternative therapies that are not strong CYP3A inhibitors. If the concomitant use of these inhibitors is considered essential for the care of the patient, monitor patient more frequently for XOSPATA adverse reactions. Interrupt and reduce XOSPATA dosage in patients with serious or life-threatening toxicity.

    Drugs that Target 5HT2B Receptor or Sigma Nonspecific Receptor Concomitant use of XOSPATA may reduce the effects of drugs that target the 5HT2B receptor or the sigma nonspecific receptor (e.g., escitalopram, fluoxetine, sertraline). Avoid concomitant use of these drugs with XOSPATA unless their use is considered essential for the care of the patient.

    P-gp, BCRP, and OCT1 Substrates Based on in vitro data, gilteritinib is a P-gp, breast cancer resistant protein (BCRP), and organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) inhibitor. Coadministration of gilteritinib may increase the exposure of P-gp, BCRP, and OCT1 substrates, which may increase the incidence and severity of adverse reactions of these substrates. For P-gp, BCRP, or OCT1 substrates where small concentration changes may lead to serious adverse reactions, decrease the dose or modify the dosing frequency of such substrate and monitor for adverse reactions as recommended in the respective prescribing information.

    Specific Populations

    Lactation Advise women not to breastfeed during treatment with XOSPATA and for 2 months after the last dose.

    Full Prescribing Information

    Cautionary Notes

    In this press release, statements made with respect to current plans, estimates, strategies and beliefs and other statements that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements about the future performance of Astellas. These statements are based on management's current assumptions and beliefs in light of the information currently available to it and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to: (i) changes in general economic conditions and in laws and regulations, relating to pharmaceutical markets, (ii) currency exchange rate fluctuations, (iii) delays in new product launches, (iv) the inability of Astellas to market existing and new products effectively, (v) the inability of Astellas to continue to effectively research and develop products accepted by customers in highly competitive markets, and (vi) infringements of Astellas' intellectual property rights by third parties. Information about pharmaceutical products (including products currently in development) which is included in this press release is not intended to constitute an advertisement or medical advice.

    View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/astellas-presents-new-data-that-explores-potential-of-its-cancer-therapies-at-2025-asco-annual-meeting-302458480.html

    SOURCE Astellas Pharma Inc.

  • Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Bolster Equitable Cancer Care

    In the rapidly evolving landscape of medical technology, artificial intelligence (AI) is carving out an increasingly significant role, particularly in the field of oncology. A recent manuscript titled “Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Care: Addressing Challenges and Health Equity,” published in the April 2025 issue of ONCOLOGY®, highlights this transformation. Authored by Viviana Cortiana, a medical student at the University of Bologna, and Yan Leyfman, a resident physician from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health System, the work explores the exciting potential of AI to revolutionize cancer diagnosis, treatment, and overall care delivery. Their insightful dialogue sheds light not only on the technological advancements but also on the ethical imperatives and healthcare equity issues surrounding AI integration into oncology practices worldwide.

    One of the most promising aspects of AI in cancer care, as Cortiana points out, is its potential to mitigate overdiagnosis—a common and costly challenge in modern medicine. Overdiagnosis can lead to unnecessary treatments, patient anxiety, and inflated healthcare costs. AI-powered diagnostic tools, by analyzing complex medical data with speed and precision, could help distinguish between aggressive and indolent tumors, ensuring that only patients who truly need intervention receive it. However, Cortiana also emphasizes the importance of robust validation of these tools using diverse, high-quality datasets. This is crucial to avoid perpetuating biases that could arise if AI models are trained predominantly on data from specific populations, which could inadvertently lead to disparities in care. Developing population-specific AI models could significantly enhance predictive accuracy, particularly benefiting patients in low- and middle-income countries who historically face challenges in obtaining timely and accurate cancer diagnoses and treatment plans.

    Leyfman builds on this by discussing the ethical framework necessary for the responsible integration of AI in oncology. He underscores several core pillars including data security, transparency in AI algorithms, clinical validation, and addressing algorithmic bias. These pillars are vital because the use of AI in healthcare involves sensitive patient data and has real-world consequences that can affect treatment outcomes. The promise of AI also extends into practical applications such as mobile diagnostics, cloud-based platforms, and remote consultations. These technologies could dramatically expand access to care, particularly for people living in remote or underserved regions where specialist oncology services are scarce. For instance, AI-powered mobile diagnostic apps could enable preliminary screenings at home or in community clinics, with results instantly analyzed and shared with specialists via the cloud, facilitating rapid and informed clinical decisions.

    Looking ahead, Leyfman advocates for the creation of global partnerships to maximize AI’s transformative potential in cancer care. Collaborations among technology companies, governments, and non-governmental organizations could help secure the funding and infrastructure necessary to deploy AI tools globally, ensuring equitable access to advanced cancer diagnostics and treatments. This vision is especially important as healthcare systems worldwide grapple with disparities fueled by socioeconomic and geographic factors. By combining the expertise and resources of diverse sectors, the implementation of AI-driven oncology tools can be optimized to serve patients more evenly across the globe, bridging gaps in healthcare delivery that have long existed.

    In summation, the future of AI in oncology, as articulated by Cortiana and Leyfman, is filled with promise but requires careful and thoughtful action. Leyfman aptly states, “AI has the potential to fundamentally change how we detect, treat, and monitor cancer, but realizing that promise, especially in a way that's equitable, will require collaboration, validation, thoughtful implementation, and a commitment to leaving no patient behind.” This call to action challenges the medical and technological communities to harness AI not just as a tool for innovation but as a catalyst for a more just and effective global health system. As AI continues to evolve, its intersection with oncology offers hope for countless patients worldwide for earlier detection, personalized therapies, and improved survivorship—heralding a new era in cancer care.

    #ArtificialIntelligence #CancerCare #HealthEquity #OncologyInnovation #MedicalTechnology #AIInMedicine #GlobalHealth

  • Astellas Presents New Data that Explores Potential of its Cancer Therapies at 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

    16 abstracts, including two oral presentations, feature new clinical data from Astellas' oncology portfolio

    TOKYO, May 19, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Astellas Pharma Inc. (TSE: 4503, President and CEO: Naoki Okamura, "Astellas") will present 16 abstracts featuring new data across its approved cancer therapies at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting (May 30 – June 3). The research underscores Astellas' dedication as a pioneer in oncology and focus on clinical outcomes that matter to patients.

    The abstracts include new post hoc analyses of long-term overall survival (OS) data for XTANDI (enzalutamide) and two analyses for PADCEV (enfortumab vedotin), which demonstrate how these standard-of-care medicines can continue to treat patients in metastatic, non-metastatic, castration-resistant, or hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients and unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer patients, respectively.

    Moitreyee Chatterjee-Kishore, Ph.D., M.B.A., Head of Oncology Development, Astellas

    "At Astellas, we are dedicated to transforming cancer care through innovative treatment approaches. The data we will present at ASCO this year, including new long-term follow-up data for advanced prostate and bladder cancers, reflect the pioneering role we continue to play in delivering outcomes that matter to patients. We continue to push the boundaries of cancer treatment with our growing pipeline, using novel modalities and precision medicine approaches, to benefit all eligible patients now and in the future."

    Highlights from Astellas at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting will include a strong focus on Overall Survival (OS) data updates, confirming the value that these therapies bring to patients:

    Enzalutamide:

    The ARCHES five-year follow-up OS analysis of enzalutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) will be featured in an oral presentation

    In addition to the ARCHES five-year follow-up presentation, Astellas is supporting investigator-sponsored studies. Eight-year data assessing outcomes of enzalutamide vs non-steroidal anti-androgen (NSAA) in mHSPC will be presented from an independent, investigator-sponsored trial (ENZAMET) led by the Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP).

    Enfortumab vedotin

    Urothelial carcinoma

    Two analyses of the phase 3 EV-302 study of enfortumab vedotin in combination with pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC)

    Exploratory analysis of responders will be presented in an oral presentation

    Poster presentation featuring long-term subgroup analysis

    Bladder cancer

    A systematic review and meta-analysis of surrogate endpoints in muscle-invasive bladder cancer trials will be featured in a poster presentation.

    Shontelle Dodson, Executive Vice President, Head of Medical Affairs, Astellas

    "Long-term overall survival is the gold standard endpoint in cancer research. New post hoc analysis data from the ARCHES enzalutamide trial demonstrates our mission to help patients live longer, healthier lives. We are committed to maximizing the impact of our therapies as we continue to pioneer the oncology medicines of tomorrow."

    Astellas Presentations at 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

    Enzalutamide

    Enfortumab vedotin

    Zolbetuximab

    Gilteritinib

    Pipeline

    About Astellas

    Astellas is a global life sciences company committed to turning innovative science into VALUE for patients. We provide transformative therapies in disease areas that include oncology, ophthalmology, urology, immunology and women's health. Through our research and development programs, we are pioneering new healthcare solutions for diseases with high unmet medical need. Learn more at www.astellas.com.

    About PADCEV and the Astellas, Pfizer and Merck Collaboration

    Astellas and Pfizer have a clinical collaboration agreement with Merck to evaluate the combination of Astellas' and Pfizer's PADCEV (enfortumab vedotin) and Merck's KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) in patients with previously untreated metastatic urothelial cancer. KEYTRUDA is a registered trademark of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (known as MSD outside of the United States and Canada).

    About XTANDI and the Pfizer/Astellas Collaboration

    In October 2009, Medivation, Inc., which is now part of Pfizer (NYSE:PFE), and Astellas (TSE: 4503) entered into a commercial agreement to jointly develop and commercialize XTANDI® (enzalutamide) in the United States, while Astellas has responsibility for manufacturing and all additional regulatory filings globally, as well as commercializing the product outside the United States. Pfizer receives alliance revenues as a share of U.S. profits and receives royalties on sales outside the U.S.

    XTANDI Important Safety Information

    Warnings and Precautions

    Seizure occurred in 0.6% of patients receiving XTANDI in eight randomized clinical trials. In a study of patients with predisposing factors for seizure, 2.2% of XTANDI-treated patients experienced a seizure. It is unknown whether anti-epileptic medications will prevent seizures with XTANDI. Patients in the study had one or more of the following predisposing factors: use of medications that may lower the seizure threshold, history of traumatic brain or head injury, history of cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack, and Alzheimer's disease, meningioma, or leptomeningeal disease from prostate cancer, unexplained loss of consciousness within the last 12 months, history of seizure, presence of a space occupying lesion of the brain, history of arteriovenous malformation, or history of brain infection. Advise patients of the risk of developing a seizure while taking XTANDI and of engaging in any activity where sudden loss of consciousness could cause serious harm to themselves or others. Permanently discontinue XTANDI in patients who develop a seizure during treatment.

    Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) There have been reports of PRES in patients receiving XTANDI. PRES is a neurological disorder that can present with rapidly evolving symptoms including seizure, headache, lethargy, confusion, blindness, and other visual and neurological disturbances, with or without associated hypertension. A diagnosis of PRES requires confirmation by brain imaging, preferably MRI. Discontinue XTANDI in patients who develop PRES.

    Hypersensitivity reactions, including edema of the face (0.5%), tongue (0.1%), or lip (0.1%) have been observed with XTANDI in eight randomized clinical trials. Pharyngeal edema has been reported in post-marketing cases. Advise patients who experience any symptoms of hypersensitivity to temporarily discontinue XTANDI and promptly seek medical care. Permanently discontinue XTANDI for serious hypersensitivity reactions.

    Ischemic Heart Disease In the combined data of five randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies, ischemic heart disease occurred more commonly in patients on the XTANDI arm compared to patients on the placebo arm (3.5% vs 2%). Grade 3-4 ischemic events occurred in 1.8% of patients on XTANDI versus 1.1% on placebo. Ischemic events led to death in 0.4% of patients on XTANDI compared to 0.1% on placebo. Monitor for signs and symptoms of ischemic heart disease. Optimize management of cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia. Discontinue XTANDI for Grade 3-4 ischemic heart disease.

    Falls and Fractures occurred in patients receiving XTANDI. Evaluate patients for fracture and fall risk. Monitor and manage patients at risk for fractures according to established treatment guidelines and consider use of bone-targeted agents. In the combined data of five randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies, falls occurred in 12% of patients treated with XTANDI compared to 6% of patients treated with placebo. Fractures occurred in 13% of patients treated with XTANDI and in 6% of patients treated with placebo.

    Embryo-Fetal Toxicity The safety and efficacy of XTANDI have not been established in females. XTANDI can cause fetal harm and loss of pregnancy when administered to a pregnant female. Advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with XTANDI and for 3 months after the last dose of XTANDI.

    Dysphagia or Choking Severe dysphagia or choking, including events that could be life-threatening requiring medical intervention or fatal, can occur due to XTANDI product size. Advise patients to take each capsule or tablet whole with a sufficient amount of water to ensure that all medication is successfully swallowed. Consider use of a smaller tablet size of XTANDI in patients who have difficulty swallowing. Discontinue XTANDI for patients who cannot swallow capsules or tablets.

    Adverse Reactions (ARs)

    In the data from the five randomized placebo-controlled trials, the most common ARs (≥ 10%) that occurred more frequently (≥ 2% over placebo) in XTANDI-treated patients were musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, hot flush, constipation, decreased appetite, diarrhea, hypertension, hemorrhage, fall, fracture, and headache. In the bicalutamide-controlled study, the most common ARs (≥ 10%) reported in XTANDI-treated patients were asthenia/fatigue, back pain, musculoskeletal pain, hot flush, hypertension, nausea, constipation, diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infection, and weight loss.

    In AFFIRM, the placebo-controlled study of metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) patients who previously received docetaxel, Grade 3 and higher ARs were reported among 47% of XTANDI-treated patients.

    Discontinuations due to ARs were reported for 16% of XTANDI-treated patients. In PREVAIL, the placebo-controlled study of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients, Grade 3-4 ARs were reported in 44% of XTANDI patients and 37% of placebo patients. Discontinuations due to ARs were reported for 6% of XTANDI-treated patients. In TERRAIN, the bicalutamide-controlled study of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients, Grade 3-4 ARs were reported in 39% of XTANDI patients and 38% of bicalutamide patients. Discontinuations with an AR as the primary reason were reported for 8% of XTANDI patients and 6% of bicalutamide patients.

    In PROSPER, the placebo-controlled study of nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC) patients, Grade 3 or higher ARs were reported in 31% of XTANDI patients and 23% of placebo patients.

    Discontinuations with an AR as the primary reason were reported for 9% of XTANDI patients and 6% of placebo patients.

    In ARCHES, the placebo-controlled study of metastatic CSPC (mCSPC) patients, Grade 3 or higher ARs were reported in 24% of XTANDI-treated patients. Permanent discontinuation due to ARs as the primary reason was reported in 5% of XTANDI patients and 4% of placebo patients.

    In EMBARK, the placebo-controlled study of nonmetastatic CSPC (nmCSPC) with high-risk biochemical recurrence (BCR) patients, Grade 3 or higher adverse reactions during the total duration of treatment were reported in 46% of patients treated with XTANDI plus leuprolide, 50% of patients receiving XTANDI as a single agent, and 43% of patients receiving placebo plus leuprolide. Permanent treatment discontinuation due to adverse reactions during the total duration of treatment as the primary reason was reported in 21% of patients treated with XTANDI plus leuprolide, 18% of patients receiving XTANDI as a single agent, and 10% of patients receiving placebo plus leuprolide.

    Lab Abnormalities: Lab abnormalities that occurred in ≥ 5% of patients, and more frequently (> 2%) in the XTANDI arm compared to placebo in the pooled, randomized, placebo-controlled studies are hemoglobin decrease, neutrophil count decreased, white blood cell decreased, hyperglycemia, hypermagnesemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia, and hypercalcemia.

    Hypertension: In the combined data from five randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials, hypertension was reported in 14% of XTANDI patients and 7% of placebo patients. Hypertension led to study discontinuation in < 1% of patients in each arm.

    Drug Interactions

    Effect of Other Drugs on XTANDI Avoid coadministration with strong CYP2C8 inhibitors. If coadministration cannot be avoided, reduce the dosage of XTANDI.

    Avoid coadministration with strong CYP3A4 inducers. If coadministration cannot be avoided, increase the dosage of XTANDI.

    Effect of XTANDI on Other Drugs Avoid coadministration with certain CYP3A4, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 substrates for which minimal decrease in concentration may lead to therapeutic failure of the substrate. If coadministration cannot be avoided, increase the dosage of these substrates in accordance with their Prescribing Information. In cases where active metabolites are formed, there may be increased exposure to the active metabolites.

    Full Prescribing Information

    PADCEV Important Safety Information

    Warnings and Precautions

    Skin reactions Severe cutaneous adverse reactions, including fatal cases of SJS or TEN occurred in patients treated with PADCEV. SJS and TEN occurred predominantly during the first cycle of treatment but may occur later. Skin reactions occurred in 70% (all grades) of the 564 patients treated with PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab in clinical trials. When PADCEV was given in combination with pembrolizumab, the incidence of skin reactions, including severe events, occurred at a higher rate compared to PADCEV as a single agent. The majority of the skin reactions that occurred with combination therapy included maculo-papular rash, macular rash and papular rash. Grade 3-4 skin reactions occurred in 17% of patients (Grade 3: 16%, Grade 4: 1%), including maculo-papular rash, bullous dermatitis, dermatitis, exfoliative dermatitis, pemphigoid, rash, erythematous rash, macular rash, and papular rash. A fatal reaction of bullous dermatitis occurred in one patient (0.2%). The median time to onset of severe skin reactions was 1.7 months (range: 0.1 to 17.2 months). Skin reactions led to discontinuation of PADCEV in 6% of patients.

    Skin reactions occurred in 58% (all grades) of the 720 patients treated with PADCEV as a single agent in clinical trials. Twenty-three percent (23%) of patients had maculo-papular rash and 34% had pruritus. Grade 3-4 skin reactions occurred in 14% of patients, including maculo-papular rash, erythematous rash, rash or drug eruption, symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE), bullous dermatitis, exfoliative dermatitis, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. The median time to onset of severe skin reactions was 0.6 months (range: 0.1 to 8 months). Among patients experiencing a skin reaction leading to dose interruption who then restarted PADCEV (n=75), 24% of patients restarting at the same dose and 24% of patients restarting at a reduced dose experienced recurrent severe skin reactions. Skin reactions led to discontinuation of PADCEV in 3.1% of patients.

    Monitor patients closely throughout treatment for skin reactions. Consider topical corticosteroids and antihistamines, as clinically indicated. For persistent or recurrent Grade 2 skin reactions, consider withholding PADCEV until Grade ≤1. Withhold PADCEV and refer for specialized care for suspected SJS, TEN or for Grade 3 skin reactions. Permanently discontinue PADCEV in patients with confirmed SJS or TEN; or Grade 4 or recurrent Grade 3 skin reactions.

    Hyperglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), including fatal events, occurred in patients with and without pre-existing diabetes mellitus, treated with PADCEV. Patients with baseline hemoglobin A1C ≥8% were excluded from clinical trials. In clinical trials of PADCEV as a single agent, 17% of the 720 patients treated with PADCEV developed hyperglycemia of any grade; 7% of patients developed Grade 3-4 hyperglycemia (Grade 3: 6.5%, Grade 4: 0.6%). Fatal events of hyperglycemia and DKA occurred in one patient each (0.1%). The incidence of Grade 3-4 hyperglycemia increased consistently in patients with higher body mass index and in patients with higher baseline A1C. The median time to onset of hyperglycemia was 0.5 months (range: 0 to 20 months). Hyperglycemia led to discontinuation of PADCEV in 0.7% of patients. Five percent (5%) of patients required initiation of insulin therapy for treatment of hyperglycemia. Of the patients who initiated insulin therapy for treatment of hyperglycemia, 66% (23/35) discontinued insulin at the time of last evaluation. Closely monitor blood glucose levels in patients with, or at risk for, diabetes mellitus or hyperglycemia. If blood glucose is elevated (>250 mg/dL), withhold PADCEV.

    Pneumonitis/Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Severe, life-threatening or fatal pneumonitis/ILD occurred in patients treated with PADCEV. When PADCEV was given in combination with pembrolizumab, 10% of the 564 patients treated with combination therapy had pneumonitis/ILD of any grade and 4% had Grade 3-4. A fatal event of pneumonitis/ILD occurred in two patients (0.4%). The incidence of pneumonitis/ILD, including severe events, occurred at a higher rate when PADCEV was given in combination with pembrolizumab compared to PADCEV as a single agent. The median time to onset of any grade pneumonitis/ILD was 4 months (range: 0.3 to 26 months).

    In clinical trials of PADCEV as a single agent, 3% of the 720 patients treated with PADCEV had pneumonitis/ILD of any grade and 0.8% had Grade 3-4. The median time to onset of any grade pneumonitis/ILD was 2.9 months (range: 0.6 to 6 months).

    Monitor patients for signs and symptoms indicative of pneumonitis/ILD such as hypoxia, cough, dyspnea or interstitial infiltrates on radiologic exams. Evaluate and exclude infectious, neoplastic and other causes for such signs and symptoms through appropriate investigations. Withhold PADCEV for patients who develop Grade 2 pneumonitis/ILD and consider dose reduction. Permanently discontinue PADCEV in all patients with Grade 3 or 4 pneumonitis/ILD.

    Peripheral neuropathy (PN) When PADCEV was given in combination with pembrolizumab, 67% of the 564 patients treated with combination therapy had PN of any grade, 36% had Grade 2 neuropathy, and 7% had Grade 3 neuropathy. The incidence of PN occurred at a higher rate when PADCEV was given in combination with pembrolizumab compared to PADCEV as a single agent. The median time to onset of Grade ≥2 PN was 6 months (range: 0.3 to 25 months).

    PN occurred in 53% of the 720 patients treated with PADCEV as a single agent in clinical trials including 38% with sensory neuropathy, 8% with muscular weakness and 7% with motor neuropathy. Thirty percent of patients experienced Grade 2 reactions and 5% experienced Grade 3-4 reactions. PN occurred in patients treated with PADCEV with or without preexisting PN. The median time to onset of Grade ≥2 PN was 4.9 months (range: 0.1 to 20 months). Neuropathy led to treatment discontinuation in 6% of patients.

    Monitor patients for symptoms of new or worsening PN and consider dose interruption or dose reduction of PADCEV when PN occurs. Permanently discontinue PADCEV in patients who develop Grade ≥3 PN.

    Ocular disorders were reported in 40% of the 384 patients treated with PADCEV as a single agent in clinical trials in which ophthalmologic exams were scheduled. The majority of these events involved the cornea and included events associated with dry eye such as keratitis, blurred vision, increased lacrimation, conjunctivitis, limbal stem cell deficiency, and keratopathy. Dry eye symptoms occurred in 30% of patients, and blurred vision occurred in 10% of patients, during treatment with PADCEV. The median time to onset to symptomatic ocular disorder was 1.7 months (range: 0 to 30.6 months). Monitor patients for ocular disorders. Consider artificial tears for prophylaxis of dry eyes and ophthalmologic evaluation if ocular symptoms occur or do not resolve. Consider treatment with ophthalmic topical steroids, if indicated after an ophthalmic exam. Consider dose interruption or dose reduction of PADCEV for symptomatic ocular disorders.

    Infusion site extravasation Skin and soft tissue reactions secondary to extravasation have been observed after administration of PADCEV. Of the 720 patients treated with PADCEV as a single agent in clinical trials, 1% of patients experienced skin and soft tissue reactions, including 0.3% who experienced Grade 3-4 reactions. Reactions may be delayed. Erythema, swelling, increased temperature, and pain worsened until 2-7 days after extravasation and resolved within 1-4 weeks of peak. Two patients (0.3%) developed extravasation reactions with secondary cellulitis, bullae, or exfoliation. Ensure adequate venous access prior to starting PADCEV and monitor for possible extravasation during administration. If extravasation occurs, stop the infusion and monitor for adverse reactions.

    Embryo-fetal toxicity PADCEV can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise patients of the potential risk to the fetus. Advise female patients of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during PADCEV treatment and for 2 months after the last dose. Advise male patients with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with PADCEV and for 4 months after the last dose.

    ADVERSE REACTIONS

    Most common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) (PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab)

    Increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), increased creatinine, rash, increased glucose, PN, increased lipase, decreased lymphocytes, increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT), decreased hemoglobin, fatigue, decreased sodium, decreased phosphate, decreased albumin, pruritus, diarrhea, alopecia, decreased weight, decreased appetite, increased urate, decreased neutrophils, decreased potassium, dry eye, nausea, constipation, increased potassium, dysgeusia, urinary tract infection and decreased platelets.

    Most common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) (PADCEV monotherapy)

    Increased glucose, increased AST, decreased lymphocytes, increased creatinine, rash, fatigue, PN, decreased albumin, decreased hemoglobin, alopecia, decreased appetite, decreased neutrophils, decreased sodium, increased ALT, decreased phosphate, diarrhea, nausea, pruritus, increased urate, dry eye, dysgeusia, constipation, increased lipase, decreased weight, decreased platelets, abdominal pain, dry skin.

    EV-302 Study: 440 patients with previously untreated la/mUC (PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab)

    Serious adverse reactions occurred in 50% of patients treated with PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab. The most common serious adverse reactions (≥2%) were rash (6%), acute kidney injury (5%), pneumonitis/ILD (4.5%), urinary tract infection (3.6%), diarrhea (3.2%), pneumonia (2.3%), pyrexia (2%), and hyperglycemia (2%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 3.9% of patients treated with PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab including acute respiratory failure (0.7%), pneumonia (0.5%), and pneumonitis/ILD (0.2%).

    Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation of PADCEV occurred in 35% of patients. The most common adverse reactions (≥2%) leading to discontinuation of PADCEV were PN (15%), rash (4.1%) and pneumonitis/ILD (2.3%). Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption of PADCEV occurred in 73% of patients. The most common adverse reactions (≥2%) leading to dose interruption of PADCEV were PN (22%), rash (16%), COVID‑19 (10%), diarrhea (5%), pneumonitis/ILD (4.8%), fatigue (3.9%), hyperglycemia (3.6%), increased ALT (3%) and pruritus (2.5%). Adverse reactions leading to dose reduction of PADCEV occurred in 42% of patients. The most common adverse reactions (≥2%) leading to dose reduction of PADCEV were rash (16%), PN (13%) and fatigue (2.7%).

    EV-103 Study: 121 patients with previously untreated la/mUC who were not eligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy (PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab)

    Serious adverse reactions occurred in 50% of patients treated with PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab; the most common (≥2%) were acute kidney injury (7%), urinary tract infection (7%), urosepsis (5%), sepsis (3.3%), pneumonia (3.3%), hematuria (3.3%), pneumonitis/ILD (3.3%), urinary retention (2.5%), diarrhea (2.5%), myasthenia gravis (2.5%), myositis (2.5%), anemia (2.5%), and hypotension (2.5%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 5% of patients treated with PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab, including sepsis (1.6%), bullous dermatitis (0.8%), myasthenia gravis (0.8%), and pneumonitis/ILD (0.8%). Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation of PADCEV occurred in 36% of patients; the most common (≥2%) were PN (20%) and rash (6%). Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption of PADCEV occurred in 69% of patients; the most common (≥2%) were PN (18%), rash (12%), increased lipase (6%), pneumonitis/ILD (6%), diarrhea (4.1%), acute kidney injury (3.3%), increased ALT (3.3%), fatigue (3.3%), neutropenia (3.3%), urinary tract infection (3.3%), increased amylase (2.5%), anemia (2.5%), COVID‑19 (2.5%), hyperglycemia (2.5%), and hypotension (2.5%). Adverse reactions leading to dose reduction of PADCEV occurred in 45% of patients; the most common (≥2%) were PN (17%), rash (12%), fatigue (5%), neutropenia (5%), and diarrhea (4.1%).

    EV-301 Study: 296 patients previously treated with a PD-1/L1 inhibitor and platinum-based chemotherapy (PADCEV monotherapy)

    Serious adverse reactions occurred in 47% of patients treated with PADCEV; the most common (≥2%) were urinary tract infection, acute kidney injury (7% each), and pneumonia (5%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 3% of patients, including multiorgan dysfunction (1%), hepatic dysfunction, septic shock, hyperglycemia, pneumonitis/ILD, and pelvic abscess (0.3% each). Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation occurred in 17% of patients; the most common (≥2%) were PN (5%) and rash (4%). Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption occurred in 61% of patients; the most common (≥4%) were PN (23%), rash (11%), and fatigue (9%). Adverse reactions leading to dose reduction occurred in 34% of patients; the most common (≥2%) were PN (10%), rash (8%), decreased appetite, and fatigue (3% each).

    EV-201, Cohort 2 Study: 89 patients previously treated with a PD-1/L1 inhibitor and not eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy (PADCEV monotherapy)

    Serious adverse reactions occurred in 39% of patients treated with PADCEV; the most common (≥3%) were pneumonia, sepsis, and diarrhea (5% each). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 8% of patients, including acute kidney injury (2.2%), metabolic acidosis, sepsis, multiorgan dysfunction, pneumonia, and pneumonitis/ILD (1.1% each). Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation occurred in 20% of patients; the most common (≥2%) was PN (7%). Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption occurred in 60% of patients; the most common (≥3%) were PN (19%), rash (9%), fatigue (8%), diarrhea (5%), increased AST, and hyperglycemia (3% each). Adverse reactions leading to dose reduction occurred in 49% of patients; the most common (≥3%) were PN (19%), rash (11%), and fatigue (7%).

    DRUG INTERACTIONS

    Effects of other drugs on PADCEV (Dual P-gp and Strong CYP3A4 Inhibitors)

    Concomitant use with dual P-gp and strong CYP3A4 inhibitors may increase unconjugated monomethyl auristatin E exposure, which may increase the incidence or severity of PADCEV toxicities. Closely monitor patients for signs of toxicity when PADCEV is given concomitantly with dual P-gp and strong CYP3A4 inhibitors.

    SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

    Lactation Advise lactating women not to breastfeed during treatment with PADCEV and for 3 weeks after the last dose.

    Hepatic impairment Avoid the use of PADCEV in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment.

    Full Prescribing Information

    VYLOY Important Safety Information

    Warnings and Precautions

    Hypersensitivity reactions, including serious anaphylaxis reactions, and serious and fatal infusion-related reactions (IRR) have been reported in clinical studies when VYLOY has been administered. Any grade hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylactic reactions, occurring with VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX was 18%. Severe (Grade 3 or 4) hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylactic reactions, occurred in 2% of patients. Seven patients (1.3%) permanently discontinued VYLOY for hypersensitivity reactions, including two patients (0.4%) who permanently discontinued VYLOY due to anaphylactic reactions. Seventeen (3.2%) patients required dose interruption, and three patients (0.6%) required infusion rate reduction due to hypersensitivity reactions. All grade IRRs occurred in 3.2% in patients administered VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX. Severe (Grade 3) IRRs occurred in 2 (0.4%) patients who received VYLOY. An IRR led to permanent discontinuation of VYLOY in 2 (0.4%) patients and dose interruption in 7 (1.3%) patients. The infusion rate was reduced for VYLOY for 2 (0.4%) patients due to an IRR. Monitor patients during infusion with VYLOY and for 2 hours after completion of infusion or longer if clinically indicated, for hypersensitivity reactions with symptoms and signs that are highly suggestive of anaphylaxis (urticaria, repetitive cough, wheeze and throat tightness/change in voice). Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of IRRs including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, salivary hypersecretion, pyrexia, chest discomfort, chills, back pain, cough and hypertension. If a severe or life-threatening hypersensitivity or IRR reaction occurs, discontinue VYLOY permanently, treat symptoms according to standard medical care, and monitor until symptoms resolve. For any Grade 2 hypersensitivity or IRR, interrupt the VYLOY infusion until Grade ≤1, then resume at a reduced infusion rate for the remaining infusion. Follow Grade 2 management for Grade 3 infusion-related nausea and vomiting. Premedicate the patient with antihistamines for the subsequent infusions, and closely monitor the patient for symptoms and signs of a hypersensitivity reaction. The infusion rate may be gradually increased as tolerated.

    Severe Nausea and Vomiting. VYLOY is emetogenic. Nausea and vomiting occurred more often during the first cycle of treatment. All grade nausea and vomiting occurred in 82% and 67% respectively of patients treated with VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6 and 69% and 66% in combination with CAPOX, respectively. Severe (Grade 3) nausea occurred in 16% and 9% of patients treated with VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX respectively. Severe (Grade 3) vomiting occurred in 16% and 12% of patients treated with VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX. Nausea led to permanent discontinuation of VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX in 18 (3.4%) patients and dose interruption in 147 (28%) patients. Vomiting led to permanent discontinuation of VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX in 20 (3.8%) patients and dose interruption in 150 (28%) patients. Pretreat with antiemetics prior to each infusion of VYLOY. Manage patients during and after infusion with antiemetics or fluid replacement. Interrupt the infusion, or permanently discontinue VYLOY based on severity.

    ADVERSE REACTIONS

    Most common adverse reactions (≥15%): Nausea, vomiting, fatigue, decreased appetite, diarrhea, peripheral sensory neuropathy, abdominal pain, constipation, decreased weight, hypersensitivity reactions, and pyrexia.

    Most common laboratory abnormalities (≥15%): Decreased neutrophil count, decreased leucocyte count, decreased albumin, increased creatinine, decreased hemoglobin, increased glucose, decreased lymphocyte count, increased aspartate aminotransferase, decreased platelets, increased alkaline phosphatase, increased alanine aminotransferase, decreased glucose, decreased sodium, increased phosphate, decreased potassium, and decreased magnesium.

    SPOTLIGHT Study: 279 patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma whose tumors were CLDN18.2 positive who received at least one dose of VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6

    Serious adverse reactions occurred in 45% of patients treated with VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6; the most common serious adverse reactions (≥2%) were vomiting (8%), nausea (7%), neutropenia (2.9%), febrile neutropenia (2.9%), diarrhea (2.9%), intestinal obstruction (3.2%), pyrexia (2.5%), pneumonia (2.5%), respiratory failure (2.2%), pulmonary embolism (2.2%), decreased appetite (2.1%) and sepsis (2.0%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 5% of patients who received VYLOY in combination with mFOLFOX6 including sepsis (1.4%), pneumonia (1.1%), respiratory failure (1.1%), intestinal obstruction (0.7%), acute hepatic failure (0.4%), acute myocardial infarction (0.4%), death (0.4%), disseminated intravascular coagulation (0.4%), encephalopathy (0.4%), and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (0.4%). Permanent discontinuation of VYLOY due to an adverse reaction occurred in 20% of patients; the most common adverse reactions leading to discontinuation (≥2%) were nausea and vomiting. Dosage interruptions of VYLOY due to an adverse reaction occurred in 75% of patients; the most common adverse reactions leading to dose interruption (≥5%) were nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, abdominal pain, fatigue, and hypertension.

    GLOW Study: 254 patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma whose tumors were CLDN18.2 positive who received at least one dose of VYLOY in combination with CAPOX

    Serious adverse reactions occurred in 47% of patients treated with VYLOY in combination with CAPOX; the most common serious adverse reactions (≥2%) were vomiting (6%), nausea (4.3%), decreased appetite (3.9%), decreased platelet count (3.1%), upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (2.8%), diarrhea (2.8%), pneumonia (2.4%), pulmonary embolism (2.3%), and pyrexia (2.0%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 8% of patients who received VYLOY in combination with CAPOX including sepsis (1.2%), pneumonia (0.4%), death (0.8%), upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (0.8%), cerebral hemorrhage (0.8%), abdominal infection (0.4%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (0.4%), cardio-respiratory arrest (0.4%), decreased platelet count (0.4%), disseminated intravascular coagulation (0.4%), dyspnea (0.4%), gastric perforation (0.4%), hemorrhagic ascites (0.4%), procedural complication (0.4%), sudden death (0.4%), and syncope (0.4%). Permanent discontinuation of VYLOY due to an adverse reaction occurred in 19% of patients; the most common adverse reaction leading to discontinuation (≥2%) was vomiting. Dosage interruption of VYLOY due to an adverse reaction occurred in 55% of patients; the most common adverse reactions leading to dose interruption (≥2%) were nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, fatigue, infusion-related reaction, and abdominal pain.

    SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

    Lactation Advise lactating women not to breastfeed during treatment with VYLOY and for 8 months after the last dose.

    Full Prescribing Information

    XOSPATA Important Safety Information

    Contraindications

    XOSPATA is contraindicated in patients with hypersensitivity to gilteritinib or any of the excipients. Anaphylactic reactions have been observed in clinical trials.

    Warnings and Precautions

    Differentiation Syndrome (See BOXED WARNING) 3% of 319 patients treated with XOSPATA in the clinical trials experienced differentiation syndrome. Differentiation syndrome is associated with rapid proliferation and differentiation of myeloid cells and may be life-threatening or fatal if not treated. Symptoms and other clinical findings of differentiation syndrome in patients treated with XOSPATA included fever, dyspnea, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, pulmonary edema, hypotension, rapid weight gain, peripheral edema, rash, and renal dysfunction. Some cases had concomitant acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis. Differentiation syndrome occurred as early as 1 day and up to 82 days after XOSPATA initiation and has been observed with or without concomitant leukocytosis. If differentiation syndrome is suspected, initiate dexamethasone 10 mg IV every 12 hours (or an equivalent dose of an alternative oral or IV corticosteroid) and hemodynamic monitoring until improvement. Taper corticosteroids after resolution of symptoms and administer corticosteroids for a minimum of 3 days. Symptoms of differentiation syndrome may recur with premature discontinuation of corticosteroid treatment. If severe signs and/or symptoms persist for more than 48 hours after initiation of corticosteroids, interrupt XOSPATA until signs and symptoms are no longer severe.

    Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) 1% of 319 patients treated with XOSPATA in the clinical trials experienced posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) with symptoms including seizure and altered mental status. Symptoms have resolved after discontinuation of XOSPATA. A diagnosis of PRES requires confirmation by brain imaging, preferably magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Discontinue XOSPATA in patients who develop PRES.

    Prolonged QT Interval XOSPATA has been associated with prolonged cardiac ventricular repolarization (QT interval). 1% of the 317 patients with a post-baseline QTc measurement on treatment with XOSPATA in the clinical trial were found to have a QTc interval greater than 500 msec and 7% of patients had an increase from baseline QTc greater than 60 msec. Perform electrocardiogram (ECG) prior to initiation of treatment with XOSPATA, on days 8 and 15 of cycle 1, and prior to the start of the next two subsequent cycles. Interrupt and reduce XOSPATA dosage in patients who have a QTcF >500 msec. Hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia may increase the QT prolongation risk. Correct hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia prior to and during XOSPATA administration.

    Pancreatitis 4% of 319 patients treated with XOSPATA in the clinical trials experienced pancreatitis. Evaluate patients who develop signs and symptoms of pancreatitis. Interrupt and reduce the dose of XOSPATA in patients who develop pancreatitis.

    Embryo-Fetal Toxicity XOSPATA can cause embryo-fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with XOSPATA and for 6 months after the last dose of XOSPATA. Advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with XOSPATA and for 4 months after the last dose of XOSPATA. Pregnant women, patients becoming pregnant while receiving XOSPATA or male patients with pregnant female partners should be apprised of the potential risk to the fetus.

    Adverse Reactions

    Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 2% of patients receiving XOSPATA. These were cardiac arrest (1%) and one case each of differentiation syndrome and pancreatitis. The most frequent (≥5%) nonhematological serious adverse reactions reported in patients were fever (13%), dyspnea (9%), renal impairment (8%), transaminase increased (6%) and noninfectious diarrhea (5%).

    7% discontinued XOSPATA treatment permanently due to an adverse reaction. The most common (>1%) adverse reactions leading to discontinuation were aspartate aminotransferase increased (2%) and alanine aminotransferase increased (2%).

    The most frequent (≥5%) grade ≥3 nonhematological adverse reactions reported in patients were transaminase increased (21%), dyspnea (12%), hypotension (7%), mucositis (7%), myalgia/arthralgia (7%), and fatigue/malaise (6%).

    Other clinically significant adverse reactions occurring in ≤10% of patients included: electrocardiogram QT prolonged (9%), hypersensitivity (8%), pancreatitis (5%), cardiac failure (4%), pericardial effusion (4%), acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis (3%), differentiation syndrome (3%), pericarditis/myocarditis (2%), large intestine perforation (1%), and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (1%).

    Lab Abnormalities Shifts to grades 3-4 nonhematologic laboratory abnormalities in XOSPATA treated patients included phosphate decreased (14%), alanine aminotransferase increased (13%), sodium decreased (12%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (10%), calcium decreased (6%), creatine kinase increased (6%), triglycerides increased (6%), creatinine increased (3%), and alkaline phosphatase increased (2%).

    Drug Interactions

    Combined P-gp and Strong CYP3A Inducers Concomitant use of XOSPATA with a combined P-gp and strong CYP3A inducer decreases XOSPATA exposure which may decrease XOSPATA efficacy. Avoid concomitant use of XOSPATA with combined P-gp and strong CYP3A inducers.

    Strong CYP3A inhibitors Concomitant use of XOSPATA with a strong CYP3A inhibitor increases XOSPATA exposure. Consider alternative therapies that are not strong CYP3A inhibitors. If the concomitant use of these inhibitors is considered essential for the care of the patient, monitor patient more frequently for XOSPATA adverse reactions. Interrupt and reduce XOSPATA dosage in patients with serious or life-threatening toxicity.

    Drugs that Target 5HT2B Receptor or Sigma Nonspecific Receptor Concomitant use of XOSPATA may reduce the effects of drugs that target the 5HT2B receptor or the sigma nonspecific receptor (e.g., escitalopram, fluoxetine, sertraline). Avoid concomitant use of these drugs with XOSPATA unless their use is considered essential for the care of the patient.

    P-gp, BCRP, and OCT1 Substrates Based on in vitro data, gilteritinib is a P-gp, breast cancer resistant protein (BCRP), and organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) inhibitor. Coadministration of gilteritinib may increase the exposure of P-gp, BCRP, and OCT1 substrates, which may increase the incidence and severity of adverse reactions of these substrates. For P-gp, BCRP, or OCT1 substrates where small concentration changes may lead to serious adverse reactions, decrease the dose or modify the dosing frequency of such substrate and monitor for adverse reactions as recommended in the respective prescribing information.

    Specific Populations

    Lactation Advise women not to breastfeed during treatment with XOSPATA and for 2 months after the last dose.

    Full Prescribing Information

    Cautionary Notes

    In this press release, statements made with respect to current plans, estimates, strategies and beliefs and other statements that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements about the future performance of Astellas. These statements are based on management's current assumptions and beliefs in light of the information currently available to it and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to: (i) changes in general economic conditions and in laws and regulations, relating to pharmaceutical markets, (ii) currency exchange rate fluctuations, (iii) delays in new product launches, (iv) the inability of Astellas to market existing and new products effectively, (v) the inability of Astellas to continue to effectively research and develop products accepted by customers in highly competitive markets, and (vi) infringements of Astellas' intellectual property rights by third parties. Information about pharmaceutical products (including products currently in development) which is included in this press release is not intended to constitute an advertisement or medical advice.

    View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/astellas-presents-new-data-that-explores-potential-of-its-cancer-therapies-at-2025-asco-annual-meeting-302458480.html

    SOURCE Astellas Pharma Inc.

  • PFE vs. MRK: Which Oncology Drug Giant is a Better Buy Now?

    In the dynamic realm of investing, where every second counts and information overload is the norm, having access to trustworthy and independent research becomes a vital tool in any investor’s arsenal. Zacks Investment Research has carved out a respected niche by providing just that: an informed trading advantage founded on decades of data-driven analysis and time-tested methodologies. Established with the clear goal of empowering investors, Zacks has long been recognized for credible, in-depth stock analysis that remains untarnished by sponsorships or affiliations with major corporate giants such as Microsoft, Dow Jones, Nasdaq, or Forbes. This independent stance is more than a point of pride; it ensures that the insights Zacks provides remain unbiased, meticulously researched, and solely focused on delivering value to investors rather than promoting brand interests.

    One of the cornerstones of Zacks’ reputation is the innovative Zacks Rank stock-rating system, launched in 1988. This system has stood the test of time, outstripping the broader market and offering investors a chance at exceptional returns. Over the decades, the Zacks Rank has more than doubled the market’s typical gains, boasting an average annual return approaching 23%, a figure that far surpasses the S&P 500’s historical performance. What makes this system particularly captivating is its methodological elegance: Zacks combines stock prices and dividends into a monthly compounded return figure that investors can rely on with confidence year after year. This disciplined approach not only offers consistency but also ensures that the power of compounding is fully harnessed, demonstrating the effectiveness of rigorous data analysis in real-world investing.

    A fascinating aspect of the Zacks Rank is its fluid and responsive nature—rankings evolve throughout each month as fresh market data rolls in. This adaptability reflects Zacks’ dedication to maintaining accuracy in an environment where information is constantly shifting. Unlike static rating systems that become outdated soon after publication, Zacks’ methodology keeps investors aligned with the most recent market developments, offering a dynamic edge. However, to maintain fairness and precision in performance reporting, the system only accounts for stocks included in its hypothetical portfolios at the start of each month, excluding any with incomplete or disrupted pricing data. This careful curation helps prevent distorted returns and ensures the integrity of the insights provided, a crucial feature in a market often plagued by noise and misinformation.

    Headquartered in the architecturally distinctive Riverside Plaza in Chicago, Zacks Investment Research has embraced the digital revolution without compromising its core values of transparency and clarity. The company openly shares its performance disclosures and detailed explanations of its data analysis methodologies, which instills confidence among investors who seek straightforward, honest, and accountable investment advice. For those looking to integrate Zacks’ market intelligence into their own investment platforms, the company offers extensive data services via its website, www.zacksdata.com. Here, users can access a wealth of real-time price data and market information sourced from trusted providers like BATS, Sungard, and major exchanges including the NYSE, AMEX, and NASDAQ. This multi-source approach caters to both immediate trading needs and strategic long-term planning, underlining Zacks’ commitment to comprehensive and reliable market coverage.

    In an investing world cluttered with conflicting opinions and commercial influences, Zacks Investment Research serves as a beacon of clarity and integrity. Its independent, data-driven framework offers investors much-needed transparency and a roadmap for making smarter stock market decisions. By combining a proven, historically successful ranking system with open access to performance data and methodological transparency, Zacks fosters trust and empowers investors to navigate the complexities of the market confidently. As financial markets continue to evolve, Zacks remains dedicated to enhancing investor knowledge and delivering strategies that are not only innovative but grounded in solid research. Whether you are a seasoned trader or new to investing, tapping into Zacks’ expertise could be the edge that transforms your approach to the stock market.

    #InvestmentResearch #StockMarketTips #ZacksRank #FinancialIndependence #TradingStrategy #MarketData #InvestmentSuccess

  • IQVIA and SCRI partner to enhance oncology trials

    In a significant stride toward revolutionizing the landscape of oncology clinical trials, IQVIA has entered into a strategic partnership with SCRI Development Innovations, the contract research organization (CRO) wing of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute (SCRI). This collaboration is aimed at transforming the way oncology clinical trials are conducted for biopharmaceutical collaborators around the globe. By merging IQVIA’s expansive reach, robust trial management capabilities, and comprehensive data integration technologies with SCRI’s deep expertise in community oncology research and their innovative Accelero operational model, the partnership promises to innovate and accelerate cancer treatment development dramatically.

    Oncology clinical trials are notoriously complex, involving numerous operational hurdles, extensive patient recruitment challenges, and intricate data management requirements. IQVIA and SCRI are set to tackle these issues head-on. The partnership is designed to streamline trial processes by removing operational inefficiencies, reducing the burden on clinical sites, and hastening the delivery of clinical trial data. This, in turn, enhances the timely availability of new and potentially life-saving therapies to patients who urgently need them. Imagine the possibility of a clinical trial process so well-oiled that data flows seamlessly from patient to researcher, accelerating the pace at which novel drugs reach the market. This is precisely the future IQVIA and SCRI are working to bring about.

    A unique aspect of this partnership centers on SCRI’s Accelero model, which operates with an eye toward improving trial activation times and patient recruitment, particularly within community oncology sites across the U.S. Accelero stands out by incorporating cutting-edge technology that integrates electronic health records (EHRs) directly with electronic capture systems used for clinical data collection. This breakthrough integration removes manual data entry bottlenecks, reduces errors, and gives sponsors a clearer operational pathway to advancing treatment development. The capability to draw real-time, accurate data from routine clinical care into trial systems means sponsors and researchers can make more informed decisions, faster—a major leap in clinical trial efficiency.

    Dee Anna Smith, CEO of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute, expressed great enthusiasm about the potential impact of the partnership, emphasizing how the alliance could transform the delivery of clinical trials through shared innovation. “Through our accelerated operations model, Accelero, SCRI can alleviate the operational burden on research sites, enhance enrollment, and expedite data delivery through our cutting-edge technology solutions,” she explained. This focus on diminishing operational blockages and boosting recruitment rates is especially crucial for trials in oncology, where diverse and timely patient enrollment can mean the difference between success and prolonging the development timeline.

    On IQVIA’s side, this collaboration represents a convergence of vision and capability. Richard Staub, President of IQVIA Research and Development Solutions, remarked: “This collaboration embodies our commitment to innovation, efficiency, and delivering superior outcomes for patients by bringing together the best of both organizations and eliminating the complexities often associated with multiple vendors.” IQVIA, renowned as a clinical research service and healthcare intelligence provider, leverages its IQVIA Connected Intelligence portfolio to bolster this ambitious project, ensuring that the partnership is well-equipped to meet the demands of modern oncology research. Together, IQVIA and SCRI are setting the stage for a new era of clinical trial success—one that unlocks faster, smarter, and more patient-centered cancer research.

    #ClinicalTrials #OncologyInnovation #IQVIA #SarahCannon #CancerResearch #HealthcareInnovation #BiopharmaCollaborations

  • Fat-Rich Fluid Found to Fuel Immune Failure in Ovarian Cancer

    A groundbreaking study conducted by Irish researchers has shed new light on the complex interactions between the immune system and ovarian cancer, particularly in its advanced stages. The research focuses on a lipid-rich fluid present in the abdomen called ascites, which is commonly found in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. This fluid has now been identified as a key factor in impairing the body's immune response against the cancer, revealing crucial information that could pave the way for more effective treatments. Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal gynecological malignancies due to its often late diagnosis and its ability to evade the body's natural defenses. One of the significant challenges in treating this disease is the cancer's capacity to suppress the immune system, thus allowing tumor cells to proliferate and spread more easily. Ascites, the fluid buildup in the peritoneal cavity seen in many advanced cases, has long been recognized as a symptom and a contributor to disease progression, but its precise role in modulating immune activity has remained unclear until now. The Irish-led research team has provided compelling evidence showing that the lipid-rich nature of ascitic fluid plays a pivotal role in weakening immune responses. Lipids, or fats, present in this fluid appear to interfere with immune cells' ability to function effectively, undermining their capacity to attack and destroy cancer cells. This discovery is significant as it highlights an aspect of the tumor microenvironment that can be targeted to restore or enhance immune function. By analyzing samples of ascitic fluid from ovarian cancer patients and conducting detailed immunological assessments, the researchers identified specific mechanisms through which lipids suppress immune cell activity. These mechanisms involve alterations in immune cell metabolism and signaling pathways essential for mounting a robust anti-tumor response. The findings suggest that targeting these lipid-related pathways could help reverse immunosuppression. The implications of this study are far-reaching in the context of immunotherapy, a rapidly evolving field in cancer treatment. Immunotherapies aim to harness and amplify the body's own immune system to fight cancer, but their success in ovarian cancer has been limited to date, partly due to the immunosuppressive environment created by factors like ascites. By understanding how ascites-derived lipids impair immune function, new therapeutic strategies can be developed to counteract this suppression, potentially improving the efficacy of existing immunotherapies or leading to novel treatments. Furthermore, the research underscores the importance of the tumor microenvironment in cancer progression and treatment resistance. Ovarian cancer does not exist in isolation; the surrounding bodily fluids, cells, and molecular components all interact with the tumor, influencing its behavior and the patient's response to therapy. Addressing these interactions holistically is essential for developing more effective interventions. This study also opens avenues for the development of biomarkers based on the lipid composition of ascitic fluid, which could be used to predict patients' response to immunotherapy or other treatments. By tailoring therapy according to an individual's tumor microenvironment characteristics, personalized medicine approaches could be enhanced, leading to better outcomes. The lead investigators emphasize the necessity of further research to translate these findings into clinical applications. This will involve developing drugs or therapeutic approaches that can selectively target the immunosuppressive lipid components within ascites without compromising overall patient health. Clinical trials will be essential to assess safety and efficacy. In conclusion, this pioneering research conducted by Irish scientists marks a significant advance in understanding the interplay between ascitic fluid lipids and immune function in advanced ovarian cancer. It highlights a previously underappreciated factor contributing to immune evasion and suggests promising new targets for therapy. Such insights bring hope for improving the prognosis and quality of life for patients battling this challenging disease. Ongoing efforts to unravel the complexities of the tumor microenvironment continue to provide critical knowledge that will drive innovations in cancer treatment.

  • Oncology Institute And 2 Other Promising Penny Stocks To Watch

    Over the last 7 days, the United States market has risen by 2.9%, and over the past year, it is up 12%, reflecting a period of growth and optimism. In such a climate, identifying stocks with solid financials and growth potential becomes crucial for investors seeking value. While penny stocks may seem like a term from another era, they continue to represent opportunities in smaller or emerging companies that can offer both affordability and potential upside when chosen wisely.

    Top 10 Penny Stocks In The United States

    NameShare PriceMarket CapRewards & RisksSafe Bulkers (NYSE:SB)$3.75$393.17M✅ 4 ⚠️ 3 Tuya (NYSE:TUYA)$2.73$1.64B✅ 3 ⚠️ 3 Perfect (NYSE:PERF)$1.78$181.29M✅ 3 ⚠️ 0 Flexible Solutions International (NYSEAM:FSI)$4.40$55.65M✅ 1 ⚠️ 2 Imperial Petroleum (NasdaqCM:IMPP)$2.51$86.38M✅ 3 ⚠️ 2 Table Trac (OTCPK:TBTC)$4.7025$21.82M✅ 2 ⚠️ 2 BAB (OTCPK:BABB)$0.7913$5.75M✅ 2 ⚠️ 3 Lifetime Brands (NasdaqGS:LCUT)$3.28$73.52M✅ 3 ⚠️ 2 New Horizon Aircraft (NasdaqCM:HOVR)$0.6822$21.41M✅ 3 ⚠️ 5 CBAK Energy Technology (NasdaqCM:CBAT)$0.872$78.43M✅ 4 ⚠️ 1

    Here we highlight a subset of our preferred stocks from the screener.

    Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★☆☆

    Overview: The Oncology Institute, Inc. is a U.S.-based company offering a range of medical oncology services with a market cap of $226.50 million.

    Operations: Revenue Segments: No specific revenue segments are reported for this U.S.-based company providing medical oncology services.

    Market Cap: $226.5M

    The Oncology Institute, Inc. is navigating the challenges typical of penny stocks, with high volatility and significant debt levels—a net debt to equity ratio of 673.8%. Despite being unprofitable and not expected to achieve profitability in the next three years, its revenue is projected to grow by 15.87% annually. Recent developments include reaffirmed revenue guidance for 2025 between US$460 million and US$480 million, strategic partnerships enhancing clinical research access, and a shelf registration filing for US$76.79 million in common stock offerings. The company has also launched initiatives like the Florida Oncology Network to expand its care footprint.

    Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★☆☆

    Overview: Ardelyx, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company that focuses on discovering, developing, and commercializing medicines for unmet medical needs globally, with a market cap of approximately $928.31 million.

    Operations: The company generates revenue primarily from the development and commercialization of biopharmaceutical products, amounting to $361.71 million.

    Market Cap: $928.31M

    Ardelyx, Inc. is experiencing the volatility typical of penny stocks, with a focus on developing innovative treatments like IBSRELA and XPHOZAH. Despite being currently unprofitable with a negative return on equity of -36.91%, the company has shown promising revenue growth, reporting US$74.11 million in Q1 2025 compared to US$46.02 million a year ago. Ardelyx's short-term assets significantly exceed its liabilities, providing some financial stability amidst high debt levels that have increased over five years. Recent board appointments and product announcements highlight strategic efforts to strengthen its market position in biopharmaceuticals for unmet medical needs.

    Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★★

    Overview: Clover Health Investments, Corp. offers Medicare Advantage plans in the United States and has a market cap of approximately $1.80 billion.

    Operations: The company generates revenue primarily through its Insurance segment, which accounted for $1.49 billion.

    Market Cap: $1.8B

    Clover Health Investments is navigating the penny stock landscape with a focus on Medicare Advantage plans, reporting a reduced net loss of US$1.27 million in Q1 2025 from US$19.17 million a year ago. Despite being unprofitable and having a negative return on equity, it remains debt-free and its short-term assets cover both short- and long-term liabilities, providing some financial cushion. Recent leadership changes include the appointment of Dr. Shelly Gupta as Chief Medical Officer to enhance clinical operations and patient access initiatives, while significant insider selling may raise concerns among investors about internal confidence levels.

    Taking Advantage

    Reveal the 723 hidden gems among our screener with a single click here.

    Curious About Other Options?

    This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

  • Genmab A/S: Transitioning From Royalty Model To Commercial-Stage Oncology (OTCMKTS:GNMSF)

    Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

    Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.